Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 101207

Summary: Consider OOo 1.1 for the next beta.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nick Marsh <nmarsh1>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Dan Williams <dcbw>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: alex, djh, djuran, dkelson, jroyse, menscher, michael, p.van.egdom, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://download.services.openoffice.org/ooo/dev_docs/source/1.1rc2/features.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-07 18:56:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 100644    

Description Nick Marsh 2003-07-30 00:39:57 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.0.1)
Gecko/20030306 Camino/0.7

Description of problem:
Please consider upgrading to OOo 1.1. Even though it's a RC, it's 1000x faster
than OOo 1.0.X. The benefits to the RHL project will outwiegh the risks.

Change log is at:  
http://download.services.openoffice.org/ooo/dev_docs/source/1.1rc2/features.html



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHL

Actual Results:  Many packages are out of data, OOo is one of them.

Expected Results:  RHL should be more on the "bleeding edge".

Additional info:
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2003-07-30 05:05:00 UTC 
*** Bug 101210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Michael Lee Yohe 2003-08-08 17:30:56 UTC 
There are packages slated to be included with the next release that feature beta
packages, anyhow.  OOo 1.1 is definitely better than OOo 1.0.x.
Comment 3 Nick Marsh 2003-08-08 18:19:44 UTC 
I've seen the the beta-list that Red Hat is working on porting their OOo tweaks
into the 1.1 release. It's just taking some time. Additionally, they have added
this ito the list of things that would make Cambridge "not suck".  Hopefully OOo
will make it into the BETA2.
Comment 4 Nick Marsh 2003-08-15 17:01:20 UTC 
OOo 1.1 final RC is out today.

http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.1rc3/features.html
Comment 5 Alejandro Gonzalez Hernandez - Imoq 2003-08-15 17:43:46 UTC 
Definitely this is something I am looking forward to see.

Right now, OOo 1.0.x has a poor performance in many Pentium III I have seen.
Comment 6 Dax Kelson 2003-08-15 23:12:53 UTC 
Yes, I would like to see OOv1.1 in RHEL 3 and Cambridge as well.

We runs lots of RH desktops in our office and this would be *much* appreciated.
Comment 7 Josiah Royse 2003-08-16 01:28:48 UTC 
Does OO 1.1.x run faster than 1.0.x?  This might help Bug 88268 concerning the
spell check feature using mega swap space.
Comment 8 Dan Williams 2003-10-07 18:56:23 UTC 
1.1 will be in next Fedora release.
Comment 9 Nick Marsh 2003-10-07 20:37:05 UTC 
The next beta, or the next full version?
Comment 10 Dan Williams 2003-10-07 20:53:16 UTC 
Fedora Test 3, should be showing up on Rawhide soon.