Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1036567
Summary: | why ExclusiveArch? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Component: | springlobby | Assignee: | Gilboa Davara <gilboad> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 20 | CC: | gilboad |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-12-23 03:44:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 467765 |
Description
Dan Horák
2013-12-02 09:56:13 UTC
It should be %{ix86} x86_64. Thanks. As for arm, its not officially supported [1] by springrts and its unlikely that it will be officially supported in the foreseeable future. I'll fix the broken ExclusiveArch ASAP. - Gilboa [1] http://springrts.com/wiki/Spring_on_ARM Rechecked: The ExclusiveArch is i386 x86_64 which covers the currently supported platforms. (I had a weird build issues with mock when using %{ix86} and was pressed on time to get it working). Is it %{ix86} vs. "i386 x86_64" considered nice to have or required? - Gilboa (In reply to Gilboa Davara from comment #2) > Rechecked: The ExclusiveArch is i386 x86_64 which covers the currently > supported platforms. > (I had a weird build issues with mock when using %{ix86} and was pressed on > time to get it working). Is it %{ix86} vs. "i386 x86_64" considered nice to > have or required? having i386 in the list means there is no 32-bit variant built as Fedora builds as i686 Also still I don't see the reason for the ExclusiveArch as the package builds fine on ARM (http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172161), ppc/ppc64 and s390/s390x and there is no report from non-x86 arch in Fedora stating it doesn't work or it crashes. And when it will appear then the arch team can look on it before Exclude/ExclusiveArch is set. That's how things work in Fedora. Dan, 1. I'll issue a fixed build with x86_64 %{ix86}. 2. Builds != Works. Given the fact that spring/arm is considered non-supported-semi-compiles-state and ppc*/s390 are *completely* unsupported by upstream, there's not much I can do if/when bugs are reported. If you're willing to take ownership of spring/arm, I'll be happy to added it to the supported Arch list. Thanks for the missing arch report. - Gilboa springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 spring-95.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc19 spring-95.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc20 spring-95.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc18 Package spring-95.0-3.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing spring-95.0-3.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22807/spring-95.0-3.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). spring-95.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. spring-95.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. spring-95.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |