Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 106460

Summary: distroverpkg is wrong
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: yumAssignee: Jeff Johnson <jbj>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: diego.cortassa, dstewart, notting, nphilipp, stevewa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-12 20:57:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 100643    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to fix it none

Description Michael Schwendt 2003-10-07 12:23:54 UTC
This is about updated Fedora Core 0.94:

/etc/yum.conf contains

  distroverpkg=redhat-release

which causes Yum to fail determining the OS version because the "redhat-release"
package has been replaced with the "fedora-release" package. Changing the line to

  distroverpkg=fedora-release

works for me.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
yum-2.0.3-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
yum info 2>&1 | grep Server


Actual Results:  Server: Red Hat Linux Null - i386 - Base


Expected Results:  Server: Red Hat Linux 0.94 - i386 - Base

Comment 1 Doug Stewart 2003-10-07 19:55:00 UTC
I can verify that the above solution solves the problem.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-07 20:07:09 UTC
Created attachment 94995 [details]
patch to fix it

This patch may be a better long term solution.

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-07 20:07:55 UTC
Actually, doing *both* is probably best. s/Red Hat Linux/Fedora Core/ in
yum.conf too.

Comment 4 Seth Vidal 2003-10-11 18:45:51 UTC
ok - s/name/provides/ has occurred for the config.py code. Thanks.

I can build a package w/whatever config you want, as, I'm sure, you can.


Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-15 02:59:06 UTC
*** Bug 107098 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jeff Johnson 2003-10-20 13:31:00 UTC
*** Bug 107521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-21 20:42:51 UTC
should be fixed in 2.0.4-1

Comment 8 Nils Philippsen 2004-05-12 06:49:33 UTC
yum-2.0.7-1.1 references redhat-release again.

Comment 9 Seth Vidal 2004-05-12 20:57:14 UTC
spoke with sopwith, who made these changes. having it be
redhat-release means it works in fedora core and rhel w/o any change.

that make sense?
so I'm reclosing.