Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 107596
Summary: | (E100) invalid driver asignation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | acount closed by user <a1459440> |
Component: | hwdata | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-06-28 20:27:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
acount closed by user
2003-10-20 22:05:43 UTC
*** Bug 107597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The intel IDs at least are supported by eepro100; there's no reason that e100 can't support them, I'd think. e100 _only_ gets support for: 0x8086, 0x1029 0x8086, 0x1030 0x8086, 0x1031 0x8086, 0x1032 0x8086, 0x1033 0x8086, 0x1034 0x8086, 0x1038 0x8086, 0x1039 0x8086, 0x103A 0x8086, 0x103B 0x8086, 0x103C 0x8086, 0x103D 0x8086, 0x103E 0x8086, 0x1050 0x8086, 0x1051 0x8086, 0x1052 0x8086, 0x1053 0x8086, 0x1054 0x8086, 0x1055 0x8086, 0x1059 0x8086, 0x1209 0x8086, 0x1229 0x8086, 0x2449 0x8086, 0x2459 0x8086, 0x245D -- eepro100 , in theory, supports more NIC but _intel guys_ said that it's not possible because they are special hardware: 0x8086 0x1035 0x8086 0x1036 0x8086 0x1037 0x8086 0x1227 0x8086 0x1228 0x8086 0x5200 0x8086 0x5201 and these are strangers for eepro100 and e100 drivers: 0x1014 0x005c 0x10c3 0x1100 0x1259 0x2560 0x1266 0x0001 Bill? Should this be assigned back to me, or is this for hwdata? it's for hwdata guy(s). And they need to get a lot of PCI ID's from _all_ net and scsi drivers because hwdata asignations are very old. Well, hopefully most new drivers just use their own device tables. In theory, lots of the pcitable lines can just be removed. e100 assignations removed in CVS. |