Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 107736

Summary: does not handle http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Gene Czarcinski <gczarcinski>
Component: gftpAssignee: Jonathan Blandford <jrb>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ddumas
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix, Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-17 19:39:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 109188    
Attachments:
Description Flags
more fixes from Brian for http
none
gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfer-2.patch
none
gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfers-3.patch none

Description Gene Czarcinski 2003-10-22 15:26:59 UTC
Description of problem:
Everything in gftp implies that it can handle http as well as ftp.  However, it
does not seem to be able to handle http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ 

The "text" is downloaded but not interpreted whereas lftp handles it nicely.

Comment 1 Gene Czarcinski 2003-10-22 17:49:12 UTC
OK, I sent a message to the gftp upstream maintainer and got the following:

What version of gftp are you using? If you aren't using 2.0.15, I would
suggest upgrading. In all versions of gftp < 2.0.15, the HTTP protocol had a
lot of problems. Using my latest CVS version, I was able to connect to that
URL and browse the directories and download files. I have not changed
anything with HTTP in CVS since 2.0.15 was released.

Brian

I get 2.0.15 and rebuilt the rpm.  With 2.0.15, handling of http is much, much
better ... it actually handles it.  However, it is not perfect and I have
reported this to him.  It now sees the numeric directories under
/pub/redhat/linux but not the non-numeric ones (??).

Comment 2 Gene Czarcinski 2003-10-23 17:58:11 UTC
I got the following from Brian.  This patch fixes things a bit more but still
has some problems when dealing with moving up and down trees on ftp.redhat.com.
 I will attach the patch he supplied.

I have attached a patch that fixes this. I'm hoping to find time to get a few
remaining issues fixed by this weekend so I can release 2.0.16. This will be
a bugfix only release. A tarball of my latest code is online at
http://www.gftp.org/gftp-test.tar.bz2.

Brian


On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:45:03PM -0400, Gene C. wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 13:03, Brian Masney wrote:
> > What version of gftp are you using? If you aren't using 2.0.15, I would
> > suggest upgrading. In all versions of gftp < 2.0.15, the HTTP protocol had
> > a lot of problems. Using my latest CVS version, I was able to connect to
> > that URL and browse the directories and download files. I have not changed
> > anything with HTTP in CVS since 2.0.15 was released.
> 
> OK, I gave 2.0.15 a try and it does improve things a lot.  However, it is 
> still not quite correct.  For example, at 
> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux I only see the the "numbered" 
> directories and not the beta, code, enterprise, preview, rawhide, or updates 
> directories (which are seen by lftp and the same as if accessed by 
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/
> -- 
> Gene Czarcinski


Comment 3 Gene Czarcinski 2003-10-23 17:59:31 UTC
Created attachment 95437 [details]
more fixes from Brian for http

Comment 4 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-04 16:02:53 UTC
More from Brian Masey:

 Here are two patches that will fix this issue that you are having.
You can
apply these to the gftp source that I had you download the other day.
Change
to the gftp-2.0.16pre0/lib directory and type the following commands:

patch -p0 < gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfers-2.patch
patch -p0 < gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfers-3.patch

and then recompile.

I will attach patches.

http access now works "pretty" well but still has some problems.

Comment 5 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-04 16:04:28 UTC
Created attachment 95710 [details]
gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfer-2.patch

Comment 6 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-04 16:05:36 UTC
Created attachment 95711 [details]
gftp-rfc2068-chunk-transfers-3.patch

Comment 7 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-11 12:35:36 UTC
Upstream (Brian Masney) appear to have fixed http handling so it now
works.  gftp 2.0.16 has been released and incorporates the attached
patches.

I encourage the release of an errata for gftp 2.0.16

Comment 8 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-19 22:24:52 UTC
Triage->Easyfix (at least IMHO)

Red Hat does not patch this package ... just needs to be download from
upstream, change the version in the spec file, build rpms, and place
in updates/testing.

Beside http://... protocol now working, there are some reports (on
fedora-list) of the shipped gftp hanging/crashing.

Comment 9 Gene Czarcinski 2003-11-20 20:54:42 UTC
I have bult rpms which can be used for testing:

ftp://czarc.net/pub/gftp-2.0.16-0.gc1.i386.rpm
ftp://czarc.net/pub/gftp-2.0.16-0.gc1.src.rpm


Comment 10 Miloslav Trmac 2004-02-17 18:42:35 UTC
gftp-2.0.16 is now in rawhide, can this be closed?

Comment 11 Gene Czarcinski 2004-02-17 19:39:12 UTC
Yes, closing