Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1083616

Summary:	llvm make check failed in ppc64le
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Menanteau Guy <menantea>
Component:	llvm	Assignee:	Adam Jackson <ajax>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	22	CC:	ajax, bos, dmalcolm, jv+fedora, petersen, rdossant, scottt.tw
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ppc64le
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-08-13 16:58:59 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1077767, 1078190
Bug Blocks:	1051573

Description Menanteau Guy 2014-04-02 15:02:22 UTC

Description of problem:
make check failed during build of llvm in ppc64le arch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
llvm-3.4-5.fc21.ppc64le

How reproducible:
rpmbuild --target ppc64le

Actual results:
FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml (391 of 9302)
*** TEST 'LLVM :: Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml' FAILED ***
...
configure: WARNING: --enable-bindings=ocaml specified, but ocamlopt not found. Try configure OCAMLOPT=/path/to/ocamlopt

Additional info:
Problem is dur to ocamlopt missing in ocaml package for ppc64le arch
This is relative to bug 1078190

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:39:33 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 2 Rafael Fonseca 2015-08-13 15:32:59 UTC

Is this bug still valid?

Comment 3 Menanteau Guy 2015-08-13 16:58:59 UTC

It seems it has been fixed