Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 110390
Summary: | Nautilus won't "Move to Trash" in some cases | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Yeroc <cpjunk> |
Component: | nautilus | Assignee: | Alexander Larsson <alexl> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | devscott |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-02-11 10:44:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Yeroc
2003-11-18 23:37:53 UTC
Do you get a dialog that says the file couldn't be moved to trash? (The trash system is more complicated than just one directory, it will try to find a trash on that partition, and if there is none it should open a dialog asking if you want to delete the file instead.) I get no output whatsoever. No dialog box. No error message. Nothing. This is upstream as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128139 Indeed, I was the one that filed that bug hoping that between Gnome & RedHat someone would look into it and fix it... Is it RedHat's policy to close a bug if you find it logged elsewhere even if there's no fix? Unless its a stop-ship bug that we *need* to track for a release, a non-packaging bug makes much more sense upstream where the actual developers of the app and other interested parties can see it. In this particular case, I'm also the primary owner of the bug both upstream and at redhat. So, doubling my bugzilla workload by storing the bug in two places certainly isn't helping me to fix the bug, neither is having some bugs in the rh bugzilla and some others in the gnome bugzilla. I mean, why should this particular bug be in redhat bugzilla, and not the 800 other open nautilus bugs in the gnome bugzilla? Or do you think we should import all of those into the redhat bugzilla? Bugzilla is a way for developers to track bugs so they can do their work more efficiently, not a way for people to make developers work on their favourite bug. *** Bug 116290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |