Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1106155
| Summary: | docker-io: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> | ||||||||
| Component: | docker-io | Assignee: | Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | admiller, dwalsh, golang-updates, jkeck, lsm5, mattdm, mgoldman, s, vbatts | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-06-17 18:29:24 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1105908 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2014-06-09 03:18:20 UTC
Created attachment 904042 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 904043 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 904044 [details]
state.log
This looks like it's on account of some pandoc dep updates not being available in rawhide yet (which iirc occurs far too often). I'm in the middle of building an upstream upgrade as well, so perhaps you could schedule another rebuild after this is done? Let me know. (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4) > This looks like it's on account of some pandoc dep updates not being > available in rawhide yet (which iirc occurs far too often). I'm in the > middle of building an upstream upgrade as well, so perhaps you could > schedule another rebuild after this is done? Let me know. As I understand it, if you build the update after the mass rebuild lands (i.e., should be by now), that's sufficient and a further rebuild won't be necessary. We have docker-1.0 in rawhide, so I guess this is fixed. |