Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1107218
| Summary: | rubygem-rgen: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> | ||||||||
| Component: | rubygem-rgen | Assignee: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Version: | 21 | CC: | s, vondruch | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-rgen-0.7.0-1.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-07-14 13:14:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1140541 | ||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1105908, 1239338 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Dennis Gilmore
2014-06-09 20:35:45 UTC
Created attachment 906384 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 906385 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 906386 [details]
state.log
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 This is supposedly fixed in rdoc 4.2.0 (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5) > This is supposedly fixed in rdoc 4.2.0 So is it or not, since RDoc 4.2.0 is already in F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=623091 Yeah, the build is getting farther (though still failing). So, does the rubygem-rdoc package need to be retired in F22+? Would still be nice to have an updated rdoc in F21 as rgen currently doesn't build there. It is bit unusual to have two copies of rubygem-rdoc, but I see no reason to retire the independent version. We sometimes update the independent package to be at newer version then the on shipped with Ruby. That would be PITA otherwise. *** Bug 1239955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |