Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1140159

Summary: xulrunner: fails to build on s390(x) and ppc64le
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jakub Čajka <jcajka>
Component: xulrunnerAssignee: Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: caillon+fedoraproject, dan, gecko-bugs-nobody, jcajka, john.j5live, stransky
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-19 11:46:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 467765, 1051573    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed solution
none
patch split none

Description Jakub Čajka 2014-09-10 11:44:22 UTC 
Created attachment 936115 [details]
Proposed solution

Xulrunner-32.0-1 build fails with lot of undefined/missing stuff in Value.h. It seems that up mentioned architectures were omitted in configure.in, as adding/modifying definitions fixes the build(Same as FF). In attachment is patch doing these changes. Please review it.

Failing build:
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=268831

Successful scratch builds with patch:

http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1537946
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2097254
Comment 1 Jakub Čajka 2014-09-10 13:19:24 UTC 
Created attachment 936138 [details]
patch split
Comment 2 Martin Stransky 2014-11-19 11:14:52 UTC 
Is that still a problem on F19?
Comment 3 Dan Horák 2014-11-19 11:30:04 UTC 
nope, we have xulrunner-33.0-2.fc19 built
Comment 4 Martin Stransky 2014-11-19 11:46:32 UTC 
okay, thanks.