Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1149477
Summary: | abrt fails to report crashes in native code for java: reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Stadelmann <fedora> |
Component: | abrt | Assignee: | Marek Bryša <mbrysa> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | abrt-devel-list, dvlasenk, iprikryl, jberan, jfilak, mhabrnal, mikhail.v.gavrilov, mmilata, mtoman |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-10-16 21:56:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christian Stadelmann
2014-10-05 11:47:49 UTC
Hello, thank you for taking the time report this issue. This bug report should be filed against ABRT Server (http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/) but there is no such a component in Bugzilla yet. At first glance, it appears that we can safely ignore the last invalid frame in a core backtrace. Could it be possible that this bug is a result of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148207 ? If yes this bug could be closed. (In reply to Christian Stadelmann from comment #2) > Could it be possible that this bug is a result of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148207 ? If yes this bug could > be closed. Thanks! Good point, but no, this bug is caused by something else. Our algorithm based on elfutils produced a backtrace where some of the function frames misses source file name and function name. https://github.com/abrt/faf/pull/288 fixes this bug. It should get through the deployment process to our production server within a week. Thank you for reporting this issue. gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21,abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21,libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21,satyr-0.15-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21,abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21,libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21,satyr-0.15-1.fc21 *** Bug 1152663 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Package gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21, abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21, libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21, satyr-0.15-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21 abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21 libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21 satyr-0.15-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12856/gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21,abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21,libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21,satyr-0.15-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). I can configm the fix. Thanks! gnome-abrt-1.0.0-1.fc21, abrt-2.3.0-2.fc21, libreport-2.3.0-2.fc21, satyr-0.15-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |