Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1155918
Summary: | let "history list" show all records | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Honza Silhan <jsilhan> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | akozumpl, jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rholy, tla |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-02-20 08:32:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vít Ondruch
2014-10-23 07:56:24 UTC
Thank you for the report. The use case is clear. We'll take a look. For the record, the *yet unsupported* (but accepted) command "history list all" produces a different output than "history list" command, so it isn't just about adding the command to the documentation. I would preffer printing all the results after execution of "dnf history list" and don't add new "all" option. "dnf list <spec_pattern>" prints ALL matched packages too. Sounds good. One can use some pager if there will be more entries. I would be only worried about performance ... Just to clarify what was my usecase which triggered this RFE. I was trying to find out when I installed one specific package and the "history list" was the obvious choice. (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #3) > Just to clarify what was my usecase which triggered this RFE. I was trying > to find out when I installed one specific package and the "history list" was > the obvious choice. Maybe even the more obvious choice is "dnf history info <pkg>". (In reply to Radek Holy from comment #4) > Maybe even the more obvious choice is "dnf history info <pkg>". Thanks for the tip, but for this case, you have to remember the package name, which I have forget already. dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21,hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21,dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21,hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21,dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21 Package hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21, dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21, dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21 dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2139/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21,hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21,dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). hawkey-0.5.3-2.fc21, dnf-plugins-core-0.1.5-1.fc21, dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |