Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 115665

Summary: (ACPI) Dual athlon needs acpi=off
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Alan Cox <alan>
Component: kernelAssignee: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-01 22:30:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 114961, 123268    

Description Alan Cox 2004-02-14 15:31:52 UTC
On an AMD dual athlon you need acpi=off pci=usepirqmask together.
Surely acpi=off should stop trying to use acpi routing data ?? 

[Box works reliably in 2.4]

It then later dies with a spew of oops data from a network operation
of some kind.

Comment 1 Alan Cox 2004-02-14 17:46:40 UTC
Ok its crashing reliably on the ifconfig ifup of the network card
(netgear). 

dev->change_flags (hence I guess ifup)
dev->open
alloc_skb
cache_init_obs
then an IRQ coming in
and can't recover the top of the trace

So it looks like a network driver with incorrect irq protection


Comment 2 Alan Cox 2004-02-15 17:22:02 UTC
Network oops turns out to be a side effect of the broke acard scsi
module it seems (that or its just chance that acard scsi puts the
corruption somewhere that matters).

Other stuff still the same


Comment 3 Dave Jones 2004-06-14 23:32:45 UTC
how's things looking with the current kernel on this box ?

do we need to fiddle stuff based on dmi strings ?

Is it worth adding the acpi folks
(acpi-bugzilla.net) to the cc: of this bug ? or is
the DSDT too broken for them to work around?

Comment 4 Alan Cox 2004-06-14 23:40:31 UTC
Will investigate further


Comment 5 Alan Cox 2004-10-01 22:30:07 UTC
Works properly with FC3test2 so I guess the bug is fixed now