Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 116223

Summary:	im-sdk nvr and source name should include the svn revision
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component:	im-sdk	Assignee:	Yu Shao <yshao>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	eng-i18n-bugs, wtogami
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	i18n
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	11.4-46.svn1587	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-06-26 02:47:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	125270, 125997

Description Jens Petersen 2004-02-19 07:51:45 UTC

Description of problem:
Since we're currently building from the upstream trunk stable
subversion repository, I think it would be better to include
the head revision number in the source tarball and the package
revision number.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -ql im-sdk-11.4-13.src.rpm | grep bz2
2. rpm -q iiimf-server
  
Actual results:
1. im-sdk-11.4.tar.bz2
2. iiimf-server-11.4-13

Expected results:
1. say im-sdk-11.4.1568.tar.bz2
2. say iiimf-server-11.4.1568-3

Additional info:
It's nice to now when the source is changes,
and this will also make source maintenance easier I think.

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2004-06-10 06:30:57 UTC

I must suggest a slightly different scheme that would be like fedora
Extras package naming policies, and mharris rules.

Version: 1.4
Release: X.svnY
Where X is the incrementing release number of the package, and Y is
the upstream svn revision.

Including the revision number in the Version tag may potentially
clash, necessitating an Epoch increment.  Just hoping to avoid even
the smallest chance.

Target for FC2 Update on June 14th.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2004-06-22 01:44:36 UTC

Yu, thanks for changing the tarball filename. :-)

Can we also have the svn revision at least in pkg release
number as Warren suggested?

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2004-06-23 14:16:46 UTC

Should be fixed in the update for FC2 and in the next devel build.