Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 117138
Summary: | 20040228 fc-devel: anaconda traceback "error: match tag mismatch" | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Barry K. Nathan <barryn> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-04-15 05:05:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 114961 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Barry K. Nathan
2004-02-29 09:14:18 UTC
Created attachment 98130 [details]
anacdump: NFS install, Minimal package set, ext3 root fs
I have two other anacdumps (one for HTTP install, onto an XFS filesystem, with
a customized package set; the other is HTTP install, onto an XFS filesystem,
with Minimal package set). I can attach one or both if you're interested.
By the way, I forgot to mention, boot.iso for 20040227 and 20040228 was bit-for-bit identical (at least on my downloads). Just in case this matters... This is usually random tree horkage. If you're not seeing with current trees, closing. I haven't tried current trees; my employer is considering deploying Red Hat Enterprise Linux and I recently noticed that I somehow have 2 RHEL subscriptions that will expire at the end of the month, so I've been playing with that instead. However, I think this problem disappeared with the trees from shortly after I filed this bug, so I'll leave the bug closed. (It would be nice if the error message could be nicer/easier to understand, but oh well.) |