Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 118571
Summary: | Should s-c-u be able to configure user's SELinux roles? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Aleksey Nogin <aleksey> |
Component: | system-config-users | Assignee: | Nils Philippsen <nphilipp> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dwalsh, gczarcinski |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, SELinux |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-09-05 02:50:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Aleksey Nogin
2004-03-17 20:53:21 UTC
[Sorry, submitted it prematurely.] Currently, in order to specify the allowed SELinux user roles, one has to install the policy-sources package and edit the /etc/security/selinux/src/policy/users file manually. IMHO it may be a good idea if s-c-u knew to do it. I just took a look at seuserx ("seuser -X") from the setools package and it appears to me that the functionality of that code should be merged into s-c-u (or s-c-u functionality should be merged into seuserx). These might need to stay separate since some folks will refuse to run selinx (unfortunately). Oops ... spoke too soon: s-c-u DOES HAVE support for selinux now (the support is not correct but that is another bug report). This bug should be closed closing as per last comment |