Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1185763
Summary: | smuxi fails to build on ppc64le | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Toman <mtoman> |
Component: | smuxi | Assignee: | Antonio T. (sagitter) <anto.trande> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | anto.trande, dan, i, rdossant, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ppc64le | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-02 07:59:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1255741 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1051573 |
Description
Michal Toman
2015-01-26 08:59:14 UTC
hm, http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/smuxi.git/commit/?id=6fe39289285f1b6ac9731df0235873e502009da3 actually reverts what Michal proposed. He probably missed the change Peter committed that uses the %{mono_arches} macro. (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #1) > hm, > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/smuxi.git/commit/ > ?id=6fe39289285f1b6ac9731df0235873e502009da3 actually reverts what Michal > proposed. He probably missed the change Peter committed that uses the > %{mono_arches} macro. That's right but %{mono_arches} considers i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon geode x86_64 sparc sparcv9 ia64 armv3l armv4b armv4l armv4tl armv5tel armv5tejl armv6l armv6hl armv7l armv7hl armv7hnl alpha s390x ppc ppc64 but there are some missing BuildRequires packages in %{arm} %{power64}. I have one's hands tied. If a Mono based package uses %{power64} instead of %{mono_arches}, then it needs to be fixed. What BR are missing on ARM? (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #3) > If a Mono based package uses %{power64} instead of %{mono_arches}, then it > needs to be fixed. > > What BR are missing on ARM? On PPC: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2294093&name=root.log&offset=-4000 On ARM it needs log4net https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/log4net/ ok, these are all packaging bugs, I'm looking on them What's the current status of this bug? Are the packaging issues resolved? This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 21. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '21'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 21 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |