Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 118614

Summary: Patch schema for later upstream submission
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Warren Togami <wtogami>
Component: gnome-vfs2Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: jrb, lex.lists, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-24 14:10:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
gnome-vfs-2.5.91-schema_for_upstream.patch none

Description Warren Togami 2004-03-18 10:43:45 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040225 Firefox/0.8

Description of problem:
The below attached patch is necessary for the Preferred Applications
fixes in Bug #109738.  This needs to be submitted to GNOME upstream
after the 2.6 release since it is currently frozen.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-vfs2-2.5.91-2

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2004-03-18 10:54:24 UTC
Created attachment 98647 [details]
gnome-vfs-2.5.91-schema_for_upstream.patch

- s/need-terminal/needs_terminal/
- Add the about url-handler

There is still an issue I am confused about... how will end-users actually have
this schema after upgrade without doing "gconftool-2 --install-schema-file
/etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_url_handlers.schemas" manually?

Comment 2 Warren Togami 2004-03-18 10:59:15 UTC
Perhaps Bug #107994 should be fixed by adding another ftp handler? 
Sure we do not have a GUI to edit this yet like the browser or mail
client, but opening ANYTHING would be better than failing, IMHO. 
Opinions?


Comment 3 Warren Togami 2004-03-18 11:18:03 UTC
Alex mentioned the possible problems with ftp & sftp URL handling from
vfs, so deferring this until later for more testing.  For now
comitting only this fix to gnome-vfs2 for FC2, split into two patches
for easier upstream inclusion later.

Comment 4 Alexander Larsson 2004-03-19 08:42:08 UTC
The needs_terminal parts are already in upstream

Comment 5 Warren Togami 2004-10-21 10:33:33 UTC
I don't know if this is solved upstream yet.  Must be revisited.  We
had to patch stuff for FC3, but not nearly as much as we did with the
FC2 patches above.


Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 01:56:03 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping