Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 118995

Summary: (FS CIFS) mount segfault while mounting smb share using cifs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sergey Scobich <scobich>
Component: kernelAssignee: Dave Jones <davej>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2CC: pfrields, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-12-07 06:16:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 114961, 123268, 136451    

Description Sergey Scobich 2004-03-23 18:36:16 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040312 Epiphany/1.1.12

Description of problem:
I'm trying to mount smb share as root

# mount -t cifs //192.168.1.124/incoming /mnt/incoming
Segmentation fault

I've found the reason - /sbin/mount.cifs is missing.
I've forgot to install samba-client rpm.

Anyway segfault should not happen.
Note that after I installed samba-client (/sbin/mount.cifs is there)
no error appears - it is working.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
util-linux-2.12pre-3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.remove /sbin/mount.cifs
2.mount some smb share
3.
    

Actual Results:  Segmantation fault

Expected Results:  display that could not found mount.cifs file.

Additional info:

FC2T1 all updates,

kernel-2.6.3-2.1.253.2.1

Comment 1 Elliot Lee 2004-04-16 21:08:22 UTC
Yikes. This is a kernel issue as far as I can tell - the kernel gets a
general protection fault on my box.

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2004-05-07 03:57:10 UTC
Does this still happen with the test3 kernel?

Comment 3 Richard Hughes 2004-07-19 16:59:09 UTC
Problem fixed in fc2. Module fixed upstream.