Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 119208

Summary: /usr/sbin/up2date needs to be rpm_exec_t
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Aleksey Nogin <aleksey>
Component: policyAssignee: Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: alikins, dwalsh, gczarcinski, pgraner
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: SELinux
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-04-08 13:37:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aleksey Nogin 2004-03-26 13:29:06 UTC
Currently up2date can not run rpm scripts when in enforcing mode:

audit(1080298058.273:0): avc:  denied  { transition } for  pid=3821
exe=/usr/bin/python path=/bin/bash dev=hda2 ino=3662903
scontext=aleksey:sysadm_r:sysadm_t
tcontext=aleksey:sysadm_r:rpm_script_t tclass=process

Stephen Smalley wrote

> Should /usr/sbin/up2date be labeled with rpm_exec_t, as is the case for
> yum? 
[...]
> That should enable the transition from sysadm_t to
> rpm_t, which is a necessary precursor to transitioning to rpm_script_t.

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2004-03-26 15:35:55 UTC
Fixed in policy-1.9-18

Comment 2 Aleksey Nogin 2004-03-30 20:29:39 UTC
In the policy-sources-1.9.1-2 I see that the /usr/bin/up2date is
labeled rpm_script_t, but not the /usr/sbin one. If I understand this
correctly, it is the wrong one - the bin one should probably _not_ be
labeled this way, while the /usr/sbin one should be.

Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2004-04-05 20:05:09 UTC
Yes this is fixed in 1.9.2-10 or so.  The fixes to up2date and
usermode should be in place by tomorrow.

Dan

Comment 4 Adrian Likins 2004-04-06 20:19:52 UTC
up2date-4.3.15 has this change

Comment 5 Aleksey Nogin 2004-04-09 04:23:17 UTC
*** Bug 119538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***