Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1192754
Summary: | gnome-common conflicts with autoconf-archive | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> | ||||
Component: | gnome-common | Assignee: | David King <amigadave> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | amigadave, mkasik, pingou, qdlacz | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-02-25 13:29:17 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Christopher Meng
2015-02-15 04:31:17 UTC
The patch also uses the %license macro in spec file to conform to the latest revision of the Packaging Licensing Guideline[1]. [1]---https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines Thanks for the report. I split your commit into two (one for the autoconf-archive fix and one for the %license change), and pushed them to master, f22 and f21 branches. Do you want to submit an update which includes both packages? (In reply to David King from comment #2) > Thanks for the report. I split your commit into two (one for the > autoconf-archive fix and one for the %license change), and pushed them to > master, f22 and f21 branches. > > Do you want to submit an update which includes both packages? No I think you can submit gnome-common, with less karma for pushing to stable(I will +1 there). I don't thin(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > No I think you can submit gnome-common, with less karma for pushing to > stable(I will +1 there). I don't think that is a good idea. Both packages need to go stable at the same time, and the only way of ensuring that is to add gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21 to the autoconf-archive update. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO?rd=PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo#Updating_inter-dependent_packages OK, but I don't have rights to push updates of gnome-common, so please submit an update if you can. BTW, shouldn't the updated gnome-common Requires: autoconf-archive as well? Is it serious? s/shouldn't/should/ (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5) > OK, but I don't have rights to push updates of gnome-common, so please > submit an update if you can. As the page that I linked to explains, you need to ask Release Engineering if you run into permissions problems with multiple packages in an update: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/newticket I can file the ticket if you prefer. > BTW, should the updated gnome-common Requires: autoconf-archive as well? > Is it serious? It does, which seems correct to me (it does not need to BuildRequires, as the macros are not used at build time): http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnome-common.git/commit/?h=f21&id=c7e46ed9a7871908e0ce25d214c5393de9c11db4 Submitted as: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6106 Being a provenpackager, I can create the update, do we have both package built? Could I have the two exact nevr ? Sure, they are gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21 and autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21. gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21,autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21,autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21 (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > No I think you can submit gnome-common, with less karma for pushing to > stable(I will +1 there). FTR, this is not good practice nor a good idea (as David already pointed out). Package gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21, autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21 autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2158/gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21,autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). gnome-common-3.14.0-2.fc21, autoconf-archive-2015.02.04-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |