Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 119299
Summary: | Empty text/plain causes segmentation fault | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Kasper Dupont <bugzilla> |
Component: | pan | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | Keywords: | Security |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-05-28 12:19:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kasper Dupont
2004-03-29 07:49:36 UTC
Sounds like a probable duplicate of bug 120007. Could you try pan-0.14.2-5 which should fix the above bug? I have switched from Red Hat 9 to Fedora Core 1 where pan-0.14.2-2 was installed. The problem still exist with this version. The newest pan version I could find was pan-0.14.2-4 which also suffers from this problem. Where do I find pan-0.14.2-5? Should be appearing in FC devel (rawhide) today or so. :) Why isn't pan-0.14.2-5 signed? The pan-0.14.2-4 I downloaded from the same directory yesterday was signed: [kasperd@erwin:pts/5:~/pan] rpm -K pan-0.14.2-*.i386.rpm pan-0.14.2-4.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK pan-0.14.2-5.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK [kasperd@erwin:pts/5:~/pan] I think you were "lucky" with pan-0.14.2-4: I guess it got signed for test1 and test2 of FC2. pan-0.14.2-5 won't get signed until test3, and again for the final release of course. :) In that case I won't test it. I don't install unsigned software unless every line have been reviewed by someone I trust. I tried pan-0.14.2-gmime-crash-120007.patch from pan-0.14.2-5.src.rpm, it seems to fix the problem. Fwiw, the pan in Fedora devel for FC2 is now signed I believed. |