Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
|Summary:||gnupg2-2.1.x keyring conversions sometimes fail|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Kevin Fenzi <kevin>|
|Component:||gnupg2||Assignee:||Tomas Mraz <tmraz>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||23||CC:||andreas.bierfert, bcl, berend.de.schouwer, bugs.michael, jamielinux, kupo, rdieter, ssorce, tmraz|
|Fixed In Version:||gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc23 gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc22||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2016-02-26 07:22:05 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:||1100417, 1167656|
Description Kevin Fenzi 2015-02-18 00:37:49 UTC
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2015-02-19 20:09:51 UTC
Let's pass this on like a hot potatoe. Claws Mail doesn't use GnuPG directly. It uses GPGME. Package "gpgme". First thought is that the gnupg2 upgrade has broken something or requires an update/rebuild of gpgme. Expected? Unexpected? GPGME web site lists 1.5.3 (Dec 2014). Rawhide includes 1.4.3.
Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2015-02-20 10:42:03 UTC
I'd certainly recommend upgrading GPGME to 1.5.3 first. And investigate further only if that does not fix the issue.
Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2015-02-20 13:55:32 UTC
FYI, I did a scratch gpgme-1.5.3 build (where I had to disable tests because they were failing), and it didn't seem to matter any. :(
Comment 4 Tomas Mraz 2015-03-26 09:59:32 UTC
If you save the mail to a file and try to verify it manually using gpg2, does it work?
Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2015-03-28 19:25:29 UTC
It seems not. It gives a "gpg: Can't check signature: No public key" error. So, I guess this is either something broken in my setup or a gnupg2 bug I guess. ;(
Comment 6 Tomas Mraz 2015-03-30 09:09:33 UTC
The upstream changed the format of the keyrings in .gnupg. There should be automatic conversion the first time the gnupg2-2.1.x is run but maybe it failed for some reason. Unfortunately I can only point you at: https://gnupg.org/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.html
Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2015-04-04 19:17:53 UTC
ok. I did the process mentioned at: https://gnupg.org/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.html#keybox ie: $ cd ~/.gnupg $ gpg --export-ownertrust >otrust.lst $ mv pubring.gpg publickeys $ gpg2 --import-options import-local-sigs --import publickeys $ gpg2 --import-ownertrust otrust.lst and then things work. ;) So, I guess we can close this? I have no idea how the initial format change failed...
Comment 8 Berend De Schouwer 2015-05-16 06:32:35 UTC
This broke my keyring (I had to restore from backup) with gnupg 2.1.2. Fedora 22 Beta a few days ago. It works for me(tm) with gnupg 2.1.4 which seems available for Fedora 22 according to #1192353
Comment 9 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:31:26 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-02-22 15:03:18 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e7e8a7d33a
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-02-22 15:03:18 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-68edd6f2d9
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-02-23 02:52:14 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-68edd6f2d9
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-02-23 15:20:04 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e7e8a7d33a
Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2016-02-26 07:21:59 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2016-02-28 08:22:36 UTC
gnupg2-2.1.11-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.