Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 119543
| Summary: | rpmq generates a lot of AVC messages. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Aleksey Nogin <aleksey> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dwalsh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | SELinux |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-11-24 01:50:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 122683 | ||
There is a bug in the policy, that allows you to partially transition to the rpm role. The latest policy 1.9.1-4 turns off unlimitedUsers, which would eliminate this bug. It also puts the proper role transition code in place to allow the staff_r to fully transition to rpm_t role if you tun with unlimitedUsers. I am currently running w/o unlimitedUsers. And the other question still stands - does rpmq need to look at all this stuff? I am just asking it to tell me what package the /misc directory belongs to; why does it need to look at the selinux and kernel module directories to answer this question? I am seeing none of these messages rpm -q -f /misc Gives me no errors. This problem appears to be resolved. |
If I run rpm -qf /misc from staff_r SELinux role, I get over 40 AVC messages in the log: ... audit(1080728771.854:0): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq path=/lib/modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.854:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.855:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.855:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.855:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.855:0): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq path=/lib/modules dev=hda2 ino=3826369 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:modules_object_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.927:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.928:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.928:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.928:0): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq path=/etc/security/selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.929:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.929:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.929:0): avc: denied { search } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq name=selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir audit(1080728771.929:0): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=29778 exe=/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq path=/etc/security/selinux dev=hda2 ino=3712021 scontext=aleksey:staff_r:staff_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:policy_config_t tclass=dir Does rpmq really need to look at all these? Should some of it be allowed (e.g. by giving rpmq its own type)? I have rpm-4.3-0.22 policy-sources-1.9.1-2