Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1221291
| Summary: | Add protocol support for MQTT to selinux policies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
| Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Zdenek Pytela <zpytela> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dominick.grift, dwalsh, lvrabec, zpytela |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Tracking |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1269538 | ||
|
Description
Peter Robinson
2015-05-13 15:45:22 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Any update? Hi All, Is this still actual? Thanks, Lukas. > Is this still actual?
What do you mean by actual? If you mean if it's still a requirement, yes.
Why did you remove tracking? Peter, This is how Tracking is described in bugzilla: This bug is a tracking bug. That means that this bug is only used as a placeholder for a particular set of changes which are split over a number of different bugs. All those bugs can be set to block this Tracking bug, so we have an easy way to query the status of a larger project based on the dependency tree of the Tracking bug. Tracking bugs do not require a release flag or acks. Did you really mean it this way? (In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #8) > Peter, > > This is how Tracking is described in bugzilla: > > This bug is a tracking bug. That means that this bug is only used as a > placeholder for a particular set of changes which are split over a number of > different bugs. All those bugs can be set to block this Tracking bug, so we > have an easy way to query the status of a larger project based on the > dependency tree of the Tracking bug. Tracking bugs do not require a release > flag or acks. > > Did you really mean it this way? It also means it's not closed or moved to a specific release when it's not been fixed and it's an RFE so yes, I meant to have it on tracking so it doens't get closed and i don't have to keep moving it until it's implemented. This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. |