Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1250573

Summary: configure check fails on s390(x)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dan Horák <dan>
Component: PyQwtAssignee: Tadej Janež <tadej.j>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: tadej.j
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 13:28:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 467765    

Description Dan Horák 2015-08-05 13:30:51 UTC
The configure check in PyQwt fails with

...
Found SIP-4.16.9.
Found 'posix' operating system:
2.7.10 (default, Jul 27 2015, 08:20:43) 
[GCC 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4)]
Do not get upset by error messages in the next 3 compiler checks:
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned int' are the same type:
NO
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned long' are the same type:
YES
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned long long' are the same type:
NO
Found NumPy-1.9.2.
Failed to import qwt_version_info.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GxCi9a (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GxCi9a (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.


For full logs please see http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1928855

I did some investigation earlier and it should be related to some other changes how are the INCLUDES/CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS passed to the consumers, IIRC in the qmake specs (linux-g++ vs linux-g++-64). So might be actually a qmake/qt5 bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
PyQwt-5.2.0-29.fc23

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2016-07-27 13:28:54 UTC
seems fixed in F-24 and up, closing