| Summary: | USE_64 variable is not used by upstream | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkie> | ||||
| Component: | 389-admin | Assignee: | Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | mreynolds, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: |
Cause: Outdated flag was present in spec file
Consequence: A variable is set that is not used
Fix: Remove the variable
Result: The spec file does not contain an unneeded variable
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-06 00:25:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 922257 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
ping? (In reply to Marcin Juszkiewicz from comment #1) > ping? Thank you for providing the patch, Marcin. We are taking care of this issue in the next RHDS release. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Fixed upstream, thanks Marcin for submitting the patch! 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8660c7656f 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8f9d466bcc 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8660c7656f 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8f9d466bcc 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. 389-ds-base-1.3.5.15-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Created attachment 1065550 [details] spec change Description of problem: I am going through all Fedora packages to check how they treat aarch64 architecture. 389-admin has ifarch check for some of 64-bit architectures and then sets USE_64 variable. Upstream source does not contain USE_64 use - probably it got dropped like it was with 389-ds-base case. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1.42-1 AArch64 build works with and without USE_64 being set.