Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1255729
| Summary: | ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 is shipped in both /lib and /lib64 directories | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkie> |
| Component: | glibc | Assignee: | glibc team <glibc-bugzilla> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | arjun.is, codonell, fweimer, jakub, law, mfabian, mnewsome, pbrobinson, pfrankli |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Tracking |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-10-23 15:42:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | ||
|
Description
Marcin Juszkiewicz
2015-08-21 12:07:19 UTC
Just to note: pax-utils 1.1.4 builds fine. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Carlos any need for both? Still an issue in F-25 $ ls -l /lib*/ld-*so* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 230160 Aug 18 17:10 /lib64/ld-2.24.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Aug 18 17:05 /lib64/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 -> ld-2.24.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Aug 18 17:05 /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 -> ../lib64/ld-2.24.so We do not need the /lib/ link to ld.so. I don't know the history of it's presence, but I would think that after the mass rebuilds we've done it should not be needed any more by the distribution. Worse is that it will likely conflict with any future ILP32 ports currently being developed so we should remove it. (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #5) > We do not need the /lib/ link to ld.so. I don't know the history of it's > presence, but I would think that after the mass rebuilds we've done it > should not be needed any more by the distribution. Worse is that it will > likely conflict with any future ILP32 ports currently being developed so we > should remove it. Status? Can this go in F-27, there's been two mass rebuilds since. This issue needs to go upstream to Arm and get solve there since there isn't a clear indication if we need the symlink for ABI compliance or not. I'm going to track this upstream with this bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25129 I'm marking this issue as CLOSED/UPSTREAM since this is being tracked upstream. Upstream confirmed this is not a bug and is required by the AArch64 ABI. |