Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1290331
| Summary: | epel7 netcdf-fortran FTBFS on aarch64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi> |
| Component: | netcdf-fortran | Assignee: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel7 | CC: | orion, pbrobinson, yselkowi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | netcdf-fortran-4.2-16.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-12-28 21:25:44 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1285484 | ||
|
Description
Yaakov Selkowitz
2015-12-10 09:14:08 UTC
it builds just fine on ppc64le, are you sure? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=496696 (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #1) > it builds just fine on ppc64le, are you sure? It certainly does not on aarch64, and the commit in question (which was yours) indicates that it is for both arches. In any case, since it somehow managed to build on ppc64le but not aarch64, adjusting the BZ accordingly.
> In any case, since it somehow managed to build on ppc64le but not aarch64,
> adjusting the BZ accordingly.
are you sure that's correct, the fix I put in (copying the config.* files) has been mitigated with the addition of it happening as part of the %configure macro so actually is now obsolete as of 7.1 so I actually believe aarch64 is OK too.
Peter Robinson from comment #3) > > In any case, since it somehow managed to build on ppc64le but not aarch64, > > adjusting the BZ accordingly. > > are you sure that's correct, the fix I put in (copying the config.* files) > has been mitigated with the addition of it happening as part of the > %configure macro so actually is now obsolete as of 7.1 so I actually believe > aarch64 is OK too. It has not mitigated because %configure only replaces config.* under the directory from which it is called, and netcdf-fortran uses a VPATH build. The bundled config.sub does include powerpc64le, but not aarch64, and for that reason a local build on the latter fails and updating config.* fixes it. netcdf-4.3.3.1-5.el7 netcdf-fortran-4.2-16.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-215b4baa77 hdf5-1.8.12-7.el7, netcdf-4.3.3.1-5.el7, netcdf-fortran-4.2-16.el7, paraview-4.4.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update paraview hdf5 netcdf-fortran netcdf' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-215b4baa77 hdf5-1.8.12-7.el7, netcdf-4.3.3.1-5.el7, netcdf-fortran-4.2-16.el7, paraview-4.4.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |