Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1291461

Summary: qt linux-g++-aarch64 mkspec is nonstandard
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi>
Component: qtAssignee: Jan Grulich <jgrulich>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2CC: tpelka
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: aarch64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 01:28:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1285484    

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2015-12-14 21:57:59 UTC 
The arch-specific linux-g++-aarch64 mkspec, based on an earlier aarch64 patch for Fedora qt, exists primarily to add -fpermissive for JSC.  However, as a nonstandard mkspec, qmake-based projects would not be expected to check for it, resulting in build issues when only the known linux-g++ mkspecs are used in a conditional.  This is causing epel7 x2goclient to FTBFS on RHELSA 7.2.

Please rebase the aarch64 patch to a more recent Fedora version, which uses a standard linux-g++ mkspec.
Comment 1 Jan Grulich 2016-01-19 08:43:33 UTC 
Can be done, granting dev_ack+.
Comment 2 Jan Grulich 2016-03-24 09:41:54 UTC 
Fixed in qt-4.8.5-12.el7.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 01:28:41 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2236.html