Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1295449
| Summary: | "nonresponsive package maintainers" issue (please look at bug #1282825) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) <fraph24> |
| Component: | keepassx | Assignee: | Greg Bailey <gbailey> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | aurelien, fraph24, gbailey, germano.massullo, sudhir |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-01-10 09:00:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1282825 | ||
|
Description
Francesco Frassinelli (frafra)
2016-01-04 14:40:30 UTC
Francesco, I would rather email devel mailing. This goes back to the same person who is non-responsive. (In reply to Sudhir Khanger from comment #1) > Francesco, I would rather email devel mailing. This goes back to the same > person who is non-responsive. This is what I am going to do, as prescribed by the policy, on Monday the 18th, if I get no response before. I prefer not to ask to devel ml before that date: maybe they are on vacation and they just need to go thought a bunch of mail. "4. After 2 failed attempts (2 weeks of no response from the maintainer), the reporter posts to the Fedora devel list with a link to the bug report and asks if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer." -- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers Hi Francesco, Sorry for not responding, I thought I had orphaned this package a while ago. Apparently I didn't. I'll approve your ACLs request asap. Hi Aurelien, thanks for ACLs. Make me admin if you want. gbailey Ops, wrong paste. I assigned this bug to gbailey because he's in charge for EPEL packages. Hi Francesco, I assumed that Aurelien's ACL update would have included EPEL... I added you as a committer for EPEL 6 and EPEL 7. I then tried to add you as an admin for all the branches (Fedora and EPEL), and received an error message stating that I'm not allowed to modify ACLs for someone else but it appears you're an admin anyway... Can you check and see if you have what you need? (In reply to Greg Bailey from comment #6) > I assumed that Aurelien's ACL update would have included EPEL... I added > you as a committer for EPEL 6 and EPEL 7. Thank you Greg. > I then tried to add you as an admin for all the branches (Fedora and EPEL), > and received an error message stating that I'm not allowed to modify ACLs > for someone else but it appears you're an admin anyway... Can you check and > see if you have what you need? I'm admin for EPEL, not for Fedora. I assume that Aurelien should eventually give me admin permissions and add me as main contact. It's not a priority for me, because now I have ACLs and I updated KeePassX to 2.0.0 (many people were waiting for it - we reached karma +4 in few hours), but if you want to share responsibility/work or step down (Aurelien said he thought he orphaned this package) I'm here. Closing this bug because every maintainer replied and bug #1282825 is ON_QA |