Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1307818

Summary: openal-soft: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: openal-softAssignee: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: andreas.bierfert, fdc, hdegoede
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-20 19:19:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1305208    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:56:30 UTC 
Your package openal-soft failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12846438

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:56:32 UTC 
Created attachment 1125515 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:56:34 UTC 
Created attachment 1125516 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:56:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1125517 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2016-02-20 18:39:05 UTC 
Hi all,

Note I'm looking into this atm (just making sure we do not do double work) seems to be arm specific ...

Regards,

Hans
Comment 5 François Cami 2016-02-20 18:52:00 UTC 
Hello Hans,

AFAICT yes, it's arm specific.
Marek Polacek suggested building with -mfpu=neon but I haven't gotten around to doing it yet.

François
Comment 6 Hans de Goede 2016-02-20 19:19:13 UTC 
Hi François,

(In reply to François Cami from comment #5)
> Hello Hans,
> 
> AFAICT yes, it's arm specific.
> Marek Polacek suggested building with -mfpu=neon but I haven't gotten around
> to doing it yet.

Building with -mfpu=neon is wrong, because we support some non neon capable SoCs with our ARM builds, so the proper fix is to tell openal-soft to not use neon. I've just fixed this for rawhide, closing.

Regards,

Hans