Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1307883

Summary: ptpd-phc: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: ptpd-phcAssignee: Josh Boyer <jwboyer>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: jwboyer, mlichvar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-16 16:16:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1305208    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:52 UTC 
Your package ptpd-phc failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12857597

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:54 UTC 
Created attachment 1125710 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:55 UTC 
Created attachment 1125711 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 22:03:56 UTC 
Created attachment 1125712 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Josh Boyer 2016-02-15 21:20:21 UTC 
Miroslav,  as far as I understand the current state of PTP PHC support, this package is very outdated.  It was a one-off github repo Richard Cochran created around the time PHC support was added to the upstream kernel.  He never intended for it to be production code.  The github project has since been deleted.

I'd like to retire this package completely for Fedora, but I wanted to make sure that linuxptp was a suitable replacement.  Does that match your understanding?
Comment 5 Miroslav Lichvar 2016-02-16 08:16:59 UTC 
Yes, it does. If you need PTP with HW timestamping, linuxptp is the way to go.
Comment 6 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-16 16:14:46 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 7 Josh Boyer 2016-02-16 16:16:17 UTC 
Thanks for the quick response.  I've retired ptpd-phc in rawhide.