Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1326586
Summary: | Review request: Sensu | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] RDO | Reporter: | Martin Magr <mmagr> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | hguemar |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | hguemar |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | trunk | CC: | apevec, chris.brown, mmagr, mrunge |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | trunk | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-18 19:21:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1290163 |
Description
Martin Magr
2016-04-13 07:41:25 UTC
I'd drop the Group tag in all of them, it's completely unused for a while. Found some bizarre things. e.g: Dude, where's my running test suite? https://github.com/opstools-packages/rubygem-sensu-plugin/blob/master/rubygem-sensu-plugin.spec#L55 e.g: use of versioned %fcX macro instead of %fedora one https://github.com/opstools-packages/rubygem-amq-protocol/blob/master/rubygem-amq-protocol.spec#L21 Since Opstools won't be part of the RDO, but in the separate SIG, I guess this review is not needed anymore, am I correct? (In reply to Martin Magr from comment #2) > Since Opstools won't be part of the RDO, but in the separate SIG, I guess > this review is not needed anymore, am I correct? No, we still need a review. Martin, do you still need this open? I would ideally love to see this reviewed :). There has been an version update on this package since then. Should I update this BZ or do you want me to create new review request instead? I'm not clear, I guess Matthias will be able to say. Christopher, a review is still highly appreciated. Martin, please update this ticket here for the updated version. There is no need in creating a new review request, unless you'd want to separate all the packages into single review requests. |