Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1345826
Summary: | once-test fails on ppc64/ppc64le arches | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
Component: | pulseaudio | Assignee: | Lennart Poettering <lpoetter> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | lpoetter, rdieter, than, wtaymans |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ppc64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-06-22 15:27:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1071880 |
Description
Dan Horák
2016-06-13 09:26:33 UTC
seems to be rawhide specific, can't reproduce it on ppc64 F-24 in pulseaudio-8.99.2-2, made tests non-fatal and to echo the contents of test-suite.log in case of errors. from http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/kojifiles/packages/pulseaudio/8.99.2/2.fc25/data/logs/ppc64/ ... FAIL: once-test =============== Running suite(s): Once 0%: Checks: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0 tests/once-test.c:74:F:once:once_test:0: Assertion 'pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(mask), &mask) == 0' failed FAIL once-test (exit status: 1) maybe it was systemd what had the same issue ... it's fixed in pulseaudio-8.99.2-3.fc25 Than, could you try upstreaming this fix? If not upstreamable, why not? (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #5) > Than, could you try upstreaming this fix? If not upstreamable, why not? as i remember correctly i already report this issue with the patch to upstream. I will check again. i reported the bug with the patch to upstream by 2016-06-22 16:03:45 UTC , and there's no activity from upstream, status is still on new! https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96638 Thanks, I'll make a reference to that here and in the .spec |