Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1393814
| Summary: | dnf reports a lot of conflicting packages where there are no conflicts | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ali Akcaagac <aliakc> | ||||||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | jmracek, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-09 19:06:02 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
(In reply to Ali Akcaagac from comment #0) > Todays dnf update --refresh --nogpgcheck Let's start. > > Dependencies resolved. > ============================================================================= > === > Package Arch Version Repository > Size > ============================================================================= > === > Installing: > libmfx x86_64 1.16-1.20160317git7adf2e4.fc24 > updates > 33 k > Upgrading: > dracut x86_64 044-21.fc24 updates-testing > 327 k > ffmpeg x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.4 M > ffmpeg-libs x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 6.0 M > libavdevice x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 86 k > mencoder x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 868 k > mplayer x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.2 M > mplayer-common x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.2 M > perl x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing > 5.9 M > perl-Errno x86_64 1.23-363.fc24 updates-testing > 62 k > perl-IO x86_64 1.35-363.fc24 updates-testing > 127 k > perl-libs x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing > 1.4 M > perl-macros x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing > 58 k > x264-libs x86_64 0.148-13.20160924git86b7198.fc24 > rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 574 k > Skipping packages with conflicts: > (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): > kpartx x86_64 0.4.9-81.fc24 fedora > 63 k > pigz x86_64 2.3.3-4.fc24 fedora > 74 k > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > === > Install 1 Package > Upgrade 13 Packages > Skip 2 Packages > > Total download size: 19 M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > Skipping packages with conflicts ? > > -bash-4.3$ rpm -qa | grep "kpartx" > -bash-4.3$ rpm -qa | grep "pigz" > -bash-4.3$ this seems weird. re-run with --debugsolver and attach debugdata. > > Now the same with yum update > > Dependencies Resolved > > ============================================================================= > === > Package Arch Version Repository > Size > ============================================================================= > === > Updating: > dracut x86_64 044-21.fc24 updates > 327 k > ffmpeg x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.4 M > ffmpeg-libs x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 6.0 M > libavdevice x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 86 k > libinput x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc24 updates-testing > 116 k > libpng x86_64 2:1.6.26-1.fc24 updates-testing > 119 k > mencoder x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 868 k > mplayer x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.2 M > mplayer-common x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 1.2 M > perl x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates > 5.9 M > perl-Errno x86_64 1.23-363.fc24 updates > 62 k > perl-IO x86_64 1.35-363.fc24 updates > 127 k > perl-libs x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates > 1.4 M > perl-macros x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates > 58 k > sudo x86_64 1.8.18p1-1.fc24 updates-testing > 724 k > vte-profile x86_64 0.44.3-1.fc24 updates-testing > 11 k > vte291 x86_64 0.44.3-1.fc24 updates-testing > 234 k > x264-libs x86_64 0.148-13.20160924git86b7198.fc24 > rpmfusion-free-updates-testing > 574 k > Installing for dependencies: > libmfx x86_64 1.16-1.20160317git7adf2e4.fc24 > updates > 33 k > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > === > Install ( 1 Dependent package) > Upgrade 18 Packages > > Total download size: 20 M > Is this ok [y/d/N]: > > Not even yum resolves the packages properly, it also finds more updates. > > But the main question here is: why does dnf reporting dependency issues and > conflicts while there are no real conflicts ? I am getting this a lot in the > recent past. debugdata please. > > Another example: > > dnf install rpm-build --refresh --nogpgcheck > > Dependencies resolved. > ============================================================================= > === > Package Arch Version Repository > Size > ============================================================================= > === > Installing: > dwz x86_64 0.12-2.fc24 fedora > 107 k > elfutils x86_64 0.167-1.fc24 updates > 298 k > fpc-srpm-macros noarch 1.0-1.fc24 fedora > 7.8 k > gc x86_64 7.4.2-6.fc24 fedora > 104 k > gdb x86_64 7.11.1-86.fc24 updates > 3.3 M > ghc-srpm-macros noarch 1.4.2-4.fc24 fedora > 8.7 k > gnat-srpm-macros noarch 4-1.fc24 fedora > 9.0 k > go-srpm-macros noarch 2-6.fc24 fedora > 8.5 k > guile x86_64 5:2.0.13-1.fc24 updates > 3.5 M > libatomic_ops x86_64 7.4.2-9.fc24 fedora > 32 k > libbabeltrace x86_64 1.2.4-4.fc24 fedora > 151 k > libipt x86_64 1.4.4-2.fc24 fedora > 38 k > ocaml-srpm-macros noarch 2-4.fc24 fedora > 8.0 k > perl-Fedora-VSP noarch 0.001-2.fc24 fedora > 23 k > perl-generators noarch 1.10-1.fc24 updates > 16 k > perl-srpm-macros noarch 1-18.fc24 fedora > 9.8 k > python-srpm-macros noarch 3-7.fc24 fedora > 8.1 k > redhat-rpm-config noarch 41-2.fc24 updates > 60 k > rpm-build x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24 updates-testing > 138 k > Skipping packages with conflicts: > (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): > cpp x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 9.0 M > gcc x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 20 M > gcc-gdb-plugin x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 82 k > glibc-devel x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates > 935 k > glibc-headers x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates > 500 k > isl x86_64 0.14-5.fc24 fedora > 482 k > kernel-headers x86_64 4.8.6-201.fc24 updates > 1.1 M > libmpc x86_64 1.0.2-5.fc24 fedora > 54 k > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > === > Install 19 Packages > Skip 8 Packages > > Total download size: 7.7 M > Installed size: 24 M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > And here the same with yum install rpm-build > > Dependencies Resolved > > ============================================================================= > === > Package Arch Version Repository > Size > ============================================================================= > === > Installing: > rpm-build x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24 updates-testing > 138 k > Installing for dependencies: > cpp x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 9.0 M > dwz x86_64 0.12-2.fc24 fedora > 107 k > elfutils x86_64 0.167-1.fc24 updates > 298 k > fpc-srpm-macros noarch 1.0-1.fc24 fedora > 7.8 k > gc x86_64 7.4.2-6.fc24 fedora > 104 k > gcc x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 20 M > gcc-gdb-plugin x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates > 82 k > gdb x86_64 7.11.1-86.fc24 updates > 3.3 M > ghc-srpm-macros noarch 1.4.2-4.fc24 fedora > 8.7 k > glibc-devel x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates > 935 k > glibc-headers x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates > 500 k > gnat-srpm-macros noarch 4-1.fc24 fedora > 9.0 k > go-srpm-macros noarch 2-6.fc24 fedora > 8.5 k > guile x86_64 5:2.0.13-1.fc24 updates > 3.5 M > isl x86_64 0.14-5.fc24 fedora > 482 k > kernel-headers x86_64 4.8.6-201.fc24 updates > 1.1 M > libatomic_ops x86_64 7.4.2-9.fc24 fedora > 32 k > libbabeltrace x86_64 1.2.4-4.fc24 fedora > 151 k > libipt x86_64 1.4.4-2.fc24 fedora > 38 k > libmpc x86_64 1.0.2-5.fc24 fedora > 54 k > ocaml-srpm-macros noarch 2-4.fc24 fedora > 8.0 k > perl-Fedora-VSP noarch 0.001-2.fc24 fedora > 23 k > perl-generators noarch 1.10-1.fc24 updates > 16 k > perl-srpm-macros noarch 1-18.fc24 fedora > 9.8 k > python-srpm-macros noarch 3-7.fc24 fedora > 8.1 k > redhat-rpm-config noarch 41-2.fc24 updates > 60 k > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > === > Install 1 Package (+26 Dependent packages) > > Total download size: 40 M > Installed size: 105 M > Is this ok [y/d/N]: > > Even worse when doing dnf builddep to install build dependency of packages > to be build. A lot of skips of imaginary conflicting packages. Usually ends > up leaving out a bunch of *-devel packages this then ends in packages > missing other packages during ./configure time and thus disable e.g. plugins > or leave the missing package out of building the final package. This part is not a bug, when you ask DNF to install some package, it tries to install package with AS MINIMUM other packages to update, yum just enforces newest packages. (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1) > Let's start. > this seems weird. re-run with --debugsolver and attach debugdata. dnf update --refresh --nogpgcheck --debugsolver Please look at the tar.bz2 attachment. > debugdata please. yum -d10 update 2>&1 | tee yum-d10.log > This part is not a bug, when you ask DNF to install some package, it tries > to install package with AS MINIMUM other packages to update, yum just > enforces newest packages. Well! But this isn't really a conflict - is it ? At least it is irritating. If the default behaviour should be like this ... dnf install rpm-build --best ... then wouldn't it make sense to make --best the default behaviour then ? Rather than have it spit out that there are conflicts while there are no real conflicts ? Created attachment 1219363 [details]
debugdata for dnf
Created attachment 1219364 [details]
debugdata for yum
... and yes I have 708 Packages installed on my running workstation. This is the bare minimum (with a few extra packages) required to run a - cruft free - Xfce system. But this shouldn't be the issue for proper updating of packages - even on a small minimal system. Packages removed by using dnf *only*. Please can you make one experiment with yum-depricated and dnf. Please make `dnf clean all` and 'yum-depricated clean all'. Then run for both packages upgrade command. Then please can you post the output from commands? Still having this even after switching from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25 and latest dnf updates. I am still getting this a lot during my time using Fedora 25 on a small XFCE only based system. Switched to Fedora 26 (what will become Fedora 26) and still getting the same issues. Here an example from today. Receiving skips of conflicting packages, which are in no way part of my system. Neither "iproute-tc" nor "linux-atm-libs" are installed. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Upgrading: iproute x86_64 4.10.0-2.fc26 updates-testing 471 k Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): iproute-tc x86_64 4.10.0-2.fc26 updates-testing 357 k linux-atm-libs x86_64 2.5.1-16.fc26 fedora 39 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Upgrade 1 Package Skip 2 Packages Total download size: 471 k Is this ok [y/N]: Operation aborted. -bash-4.4$ rpm -qa | grep -i "iproute-tc" -bash-4.4$ rpm -qa | grep -i "linux-atm-libs" Created attachment 1264722 [details]
new debugdata
I create huge refactor of problems report https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/782. Hope that it helps. dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnfdaemon-0.3.17-3.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnfdaemon-0.3.18-1.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-2.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 Hi It looks like this issue has been addressed. From some first experiments, the output of comflicting packages (where packages are not installed) is indeed solved with dnf 2.5.x. I will investigate a bit more and in case the issue returns I will be going to reopen this report. Thanks for the support. dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-2.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Todays dnf update --refresh --nogpgcheck Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: libmfx x86_64 1.16-1.20160317git7adf2e4.fc24 updates 33 k Upgrading: dracut x86_64 044-21.fc24 updates-testing 327 k ffmpeg x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.4 M ffmpeg-libs x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 6.0 M libavdevice x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 86 k mencoder x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 868 k mplayer x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.2 M mplayer-common x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.2 M perl x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing 5.9 M perl-Errno x86_64 1.23-363.fc24 updates-testing 62 k perl-IO x86_64 1.35-363.fc24 updates-testing 127 k perl-libs x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing 1.4 M perl-macros x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates-testing 58 k x264-libs x86_64 0.148-13.20160924git86b7198.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 574 k Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): kpartx x86_64 0.4.9-81.fc24 fedora 63 k pigz x86_64 2.3.3-4.fc24 fedora 74 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 1 Package Upgrade 13 Packages Skip 2 Packages Total download size: 19 M Is this ok [y/N]: Skipping packages with conflicts ? -bash-4.3$ rpm -qa | grep "kpartx" -bash-4.3$ rpm -qa | grep "pigz" -bash-4.3$ Now the same with yum update Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: dracut x86_64 044-21.fc24 updates 327 k ffmpeg x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.4 M ffmpeg-libs x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 6.0 M libavdevice x86_64 3.1.5-1.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 86 k libinput x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc24 updates-testing 116 k libpng x86_64 2:1.6.26-1.fc24 updates-testing 119 k mencoder x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 868 k mplayer x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.2 M mplayer-common x86_64 1.3.0-4.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 1.2 M perl x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates 5.9 M perl-Errno x86_64 1.23-363.fc24 updates 62 k perl-IO x86_64 1.35-363.fc24 updates 127 k perl-libs x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates 1.4 M perl-macros x86_64 4:5.22.2-363.fc24 updates 58 k sudo x86_64 1.8.18p1-1.fc24 updates-testing 724 k vte-profile x86_64 0.44.3-1.fc24 updates-testing 11 k vte291 x86_64 0.44.3-1.fc24 updates-testing 234 k x264-libs x86_64 0.148-13.20160924git86b7198.fc24 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing 574 k Installing for dependencies: libmfx x86_64 1.16-1.20160317git7adf2e4.fc24 updates 33 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install ( 1 Dependent package) Upgrade 18 Packages Total download size: 20 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: Not even yum resolves the packages properly, it also finds more updates. But the main question here is: why does dnf reporting dependency issues and conflicts while there are no real conflicts ? I am getting this a lot in the recent past. Another example: dnf install rpm-build --refresh --nogpgcheck Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: dwz x86_64 0.12-2.fc24 fedora 107 k elfutils x86_64 0.167-1.fc24 updates 298 k fpc-srpm-macros noarch 1.0-1.fc24 fedora 7.8 k gc x86_64 7.4.2-6.fc24 fedora 104 k gdb x86_64 7.11.1-86.fc24 updates 3.3 M ghc-srpm-macros noarch 1.4.2-4.fc24 fedora 8.7 k gnat-srpm-macros noarch 4-1.fc24 fedora 9.0 k go-srpm-macros noarch 2-6.fc24 fedora 8.5 k guile x86_64 5:2.0.13-1.fc24 updates 3.5 M libatomic_ops x86_64 7.4.2-9.fc24 fedora 32 k libbabeltrace x86_64 1.2.4-4.fc24 fedora 151 k libipt x86_64 1.4.4-2.fc24 fedora 38 k ocaml-srpm-macros noarch 2-4.fc24 fedora 8.0 k perl-Fedora-VSP noarch 0.001-2.fc24 fedora 23 k perl-generators noarch 1.10-1.fc24 updates 16 k perl-srpm-macros noarch 1-18.fc24 fedora 9.8 k python-srpm-macros noarch 3-7.fc24 fedora 8.1 k redhat-rpm-config noarch 41-2.fc24 updates 60 k rpm-build x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24 updates-testing 138 k Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): cpp x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 9.0 M gcc x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 20 M gcc-gdb-plugin x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 82 k glibc-devel x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates 935 k glibc-headers x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates 500 k isl x86_64 0.14-5.fc24 fedora 482 k kernel-headers x86_64 4.8.6-201.fc24 updates 1.1 M libmpc x86_64 1.0.2-5.fc24 fedora 54 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 19 Packages Skip 8 Packages Total download size: 7.7 M Installed size: 24 M Is this ok [y/N]: And here the same with yum install rpm-build Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: rpm-build x86_64 4.13.0-1.fc24 updates-testing 138 k Installing for dependencies: cpp x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 9.0 M dwz x86_64 0.12-2.fc24 fedora 107 k elfutils x86_64 0.167-1.fc24 updates 298 k fpc-srpm-macros noarch 1.0-1.fc24 fedora 7.8 k gc x86_64 7.4.2-6.fc24 fedora 104 k gcc x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 20 M gcc-gdb-plugin x86_64 6.2.1-2.fc24 updates 82 k gdb x86_64 7.11.1-86.fc24 updates 3.3 M ghc-srpm-macros noarch 1.4.2-4.fc24 fedora 8.7 k glibc-devel x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates 935 k glibc-headers x86_64 2.23.1-11.fc24 updates 500 k gnat-srpm-macros noarch 4-1.fc24 fedora 9.0 k go-srpm-macros noarch 2-6.fc24 fedora 8.5 k guile x86_64 5:2.0.13-1.fc24 updates 3.5 M isl x86_64 0.14-5.fc24 fedora 482 k kernel-headers x86_64 4.8.6-201.fc24 updates 1.1 M libatomic_ops x86_64 7.4.2-9.fc24 fedora 32 k libbabeltrace x86_64 1.2.4-4.fc24 fedora 151 k libipt x86_64 1.4.4-2.fc24 fedora 38 k libmpc x86_64 1.0.2-5.fc24 fedora 54 k ocaml-srpm-macros noarch 2-4.fc24 fedora 8.0 k perl-Fedora-VSP noarch 0.001-2.fc24 fedora 23 k perl-generators noarch 1.10-1.fc24 updates 16 k perl-srpm-macros noarch 1-18.fc24 fedora 9.8 k python-srpm-macros noarch 3-7.fc24 fedora 8.1 k redhat-rpm-config noarch 41-2.fc24 updates 60 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 1 Package (+26 Dependent packages) Total download size: 40 M Installed size: 105 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: Even worse when doing dnf builddep to install build dependency of packages to be build. A lot of skips of imaginary conflicting packages. Usually ends up leaving out a bunch of *-devel packages this then ends in packages missing other packages during ./configure time and thus disable e.g. plugins or leave the missing package out of building the final package.