Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1424562

Summary: xsupplicant: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: xsupplicantAssignee: Orphan Owner <extras-orphan>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: tcallawa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-17 22:18:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1423041    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:34:03 UTC 
Your package xsupplicant failed to build from source in current rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17795154

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:34:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1254948 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:34:11 UTC 
Created attachment 1254949 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:34:14 UTC 
Created attachment 1254950 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2017-02-17 22:16:28 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2017-02-17 22:18:41 UTC 
Should anyone come across this one and wish to revive it, it would need to be ported to OpenSSL 1.1.0. However, since I don't think anyone is using this (including me), and upstream has been dead since 2008... I killed it off.