Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1438009
| Summary: | zsh package is missing some modules | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Julien Nicoulaud <julien.nicoulaud> |
| Component: | zsh | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | dmaphy, gfa, james.antill, j, kdudka, svashisht |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | zsh-5.2-6.fc25 zsh-5.3.1-4.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-04-09 21:51:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Julien Nicoulaud
2017-03-31 15:36:37 UTC
Can reproduce, even on rawhide. I suspect a couple of build dependencies will fix this up. I'll have a look. Fix pushed to rawhide currently. This results in additional dependencies on pcre and gdbm, but those are needed variously by systemd and dnf so there is no effective dependency growth. Can push to F26 as well, and backport to the F25 package, if the other maintainers agree. I could also just update F25 to 5.3.1 as well, I guess, but that would be more disruptive. What do you folks think? (In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #2) > Fix pushed to rawhide currently. This results in additional dependencies on > pcre and gdbm, but those are needed variously by systemd and dnf so there is > no effective dependency growth. OK. Thanks! > Can push to F26 as well, and backport to the F25 package, if the other > maintainers agree. What exactly do you want to backport? Just the spec file changes? > I could also just update F25 to 5.3.1 as well, I guess, Are you implying that the update is needed to make those modules work? > but that would be more disruptive. What do you folks think? Please do not rebase zsh in stable releases of Fedora unless there is a good reason to do so. It is known to cause problems. See bug #1296692 comment #5. I would backport just the small specfile changes needed to enable the modules. I made no implication at all that an update to 5.3.1 is needed to enable those modules. The only reason I mentioned it at all is that it would keep the branches from diverging, which for some maintainers is a concern. I know all about the need to type "exec zsh" on shells which stay open across a package update. I wouldn't have mentioned how disruptive that can be if I didn't understand the issue. (In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #4) > I would backport just the small specfile changes needed to enable the > modules. Sounds reasonable. > I made no implication at all that an update to 5.3.1 is needed to enable > those modules. The only reason I mentioned it at all is that it would keep > the branches from diverging, which for some maintainers is a concern. I prefer to make the packaging of zsh optimized for users, not for maintainers. > I know all about the need to type "exec zsh" on shells which stay open > across a package update. In other words, you would have to drop all existing zsh sessions... zsh-5.3.1-4.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b760b0e5e2 zsh-5.2-6.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-aaf65ae1c0 zsh-5.2-6.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-aaf65ae1c0 zsh-5.3.1-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b760b0e5e2 zsh-5.2-6.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. zsh-5.3.1-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Hello Can we get this backported to RHEL7? I have to use RHEL7 on my workstation and i'd appreciate if i can share my .zshrc with my Debian machines. thanks! Zsh is in base RHEL, not EPEL, so anything like that would have to go through the regular RHEL product support cycle. I don't even have an RHEL subscription, much less any influence over what Red Hat does internally. You should open a ticket using whatever support channel you have. |