Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1444560

Summary: Review Request: nodejs-regenerator-runtime - Runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, panemade, piotr1212
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-24 22:46:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 956806, 1387531, 1450723    

Description Jared Smith 2017-04-22 20:44:41 UTC
Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-regenerator-runtime/nodejs-regenerator-runtime.spec
SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-regenerator-runtime/nodejs-regenerator-runtime-0.10.3-1.fc27.src.rpm
Description: Runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2017-05-12 10:47:20 UTC
It looks like this module is already provided by nodejs-regenerator srpm.

Comment 2 Piotr Popieluch 2017-05-12 19:56:49 UTC
It is in the same source as regenerator so I added it there as a subpackage. I'm ok to split it up if that seems better (Must admit that I didn't really think it through).

Comment 3 Jared Smith 2017-05-24 22:46:42 UTC
I'm perfectly fine with it being a subpackage of regenerator.  Sorry for the noise.