Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1444560

Summary:	Review Request: nodejs-regenerator-runtime - Runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, panemade, piotr1212
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-05-24 22:46:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	956806, 1387531, 1450723

Description Jared Smith 2017-04-22 20:44:41 UTC

Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-regenerator-runtime/nodejs-regenerator-runtime.spec
SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-regenerator-runtime/nodejs-regenerator-runtime-0.10.3-1.fc27.src.rpm
Description: Runtime for Regenerator-compiled generator and async functions
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2017-05-12 10:47:20 UTC

It looks like this module is already provided by nodejs-regenerator srpm.

Comment 2 Piotr Popieluch 2017-05-12 19:56:49 UTC

It is in the same source as regenerator so I added it there as a subpackage. I'm ok to split it up if that seems better (Must admit that I didn't really think it through).

Comment 3 Jared Smith 2017-05-24 22:46:42 UTC

I'm perfectly fine with it being a subpackage of regenerator.  Sorry for the noise.