Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1524377
Summary: | LMDB.xs need 64-bit arch | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jakub Jančo <jjanco> | ||||||
Component: | perl-LMDB_File | Assignee: | Jakub Jančo <jjanco> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 28 | CC: | dan, jeff.backus, jjanco | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2019-05-28 20:50:03 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 179258, 485251 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jakub Jančo
2017-12-11 11:43:49 UTC
I don't understand, what package needs x64? lmdb or perl-LMDB_file? What's the reason of such strange requirement? Sorry for confusion. On LMDB_File git README, they have that LMDB needs x64. At first I thought it is about LMDB library. but in koji this library was built for all platforms. And compile errors point to LMDB.xs in LMDB_File library. I am not 100% sure. I will attach logs. Also for s390x recent build success, so I am removing blocker. Created attachment 1366015 [details]
Build log armv7hl
Created attachment 1366016 [details]
Build log i686
OK, so it likely wants a 64-bit arch, thus why it fails on 32-bit armv7 and i686. LMDB.xs: In function 'populateStat': LMDB.xs:118:2: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] croak(mdb_strerror(res)); should be easy to fix, try croak(mdb_strerror("%s", res)); the last 2 warnings are from a strange code - format string expects 2 parameters, but get only one, so they don't match ... This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle. Changing version to '28'. Hi folks, I apologize for the late arrival. Is this issue still open? Thanks! jeff Hello, main developer doesnt want to support 32bit. Should this be closed? This message is a reminder that Fedora 28 is nearing its end of life. On 2019-May-28 Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 28. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '28'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 28 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 28 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-05-28. Fedora 28 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |