Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1534098
Summary: | There is no versioned binary for clang++ such as clang++-5.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Roskin <plroskin> |
Component: | clang | Assignee: | Tom Stellard <tstellar> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 27 | CC: | airlied, davejohansen, ravnzon, sbergman, siddharth.kde, tstellar |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-05 14:33:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pavel Roskin
2018-01-13 03:02:14 UTC
clang-5.0.1-5.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-31b7d5c1db clang-5.0.1-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-31b7d5c1db Thank you for the fix. It works for me. I'm a bit surprised that clang++-5.0 is a link to clang++ rather than the other way around (clang is a link to clang-5.0). I think the most robust link order would be clang -> clang-5.0 clang++ -> clang++-5.0 clang++-5.0 -> clang-5.0 That's probably not a big deal in the contest of a distro that provides a single clang version. But the upstream would likely do it differently. There is an upstream issue: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28580 (In reply to Pavel Roskin from comment #3) > Thank you for the fix. It works for me. I'm a bit surprised that clang++-5.0 > is a link to clang++ rather than the other way around (clang is a link to > clang-5.0). > > I think the most robust link order would be > > clang -> clang-5.0 > clang++ -> clang++-5.0 > clang++-5.0 -> clang-5.0 > I agree that logically this would make more sense, but implementing it this way in Fedora would require patching the LLVM sources, which I'm hesitant to do for a user convenience feature like this one. Ideally this change would come from upstream. clang-5.0.1-5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. pocl-1.1-2.fc28 lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28 llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-2.fc28.1, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28 lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28 llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28 mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28 pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02c4091319 clang-6.0.0-5.fc28, lldb-6.0.0-3.fc28, llvm-6.0.0-11.fc28, mesa-18.0.0-3.fc28, pocl-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |