Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1571046
| Summary: | Need final build for F28 (fedora-release-notes) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
| Component: | fedora-release-notes | Assignee: | John J. McDonough <wb8rcr> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | awilliam, bcotton, bexelbie, bex, david, jreznik, mattdm, mboddu, me, nb, robatino, sgallagh, sgordon, stickster, wb8rcr, zach |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedBlocker | ||
| Fixed In Version: | fedora-release-notes-28.01-2.fc28 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-04-25 00:03:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1469206 | ||
|
Description
Adam Williamson
2018-04-24 02:20:49 UTC
If I have done this correctly, a build is running at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26537685 So I did something wrong with the build, however it should have built correctly. Is this a permission issue? Adam, it appears that *you* retired and blocked this package back in F27: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release-notes/c/752bcb4a7ac2ed6dda13476c9a63f25fc8ec2b8e It was never unretired (and at this point would require a new package review). Do we want to do this, or shall we move to just ensuring that a public Release Notes page exists on the web? (This would also be easier to keep updated if information needs adjustment). Here's the last go-round: bug #1506052. We _talked_ about retiring it, but then Brian and Igor put out a package at the last minute. So, I think: if this got retired, it was retired in error, and I think that should be able to be un-done without a package re-review. Yeah, we're doing that. It seems I retired it on master as well as f27. Not sure why I would've done that, but it doesn't seem to be what we intended or discussed. (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #6) > Yeah, we're doing that. It seems I retired it on master as well as f27. Not > sure why I would've done that, but it doesn't seem to be what we intended or > discussed. It *was* what we intended at one brief point in the saga, but then we stopped intending that and did something else and never went back and corrected it. Release got out the door, and it's not terribly surprising that we never thought of it again. :) fedora-release-notes-28.01-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0999b53c30 Since we have a build now +1 Blocker +1 blocker Accepting. fedora-release-notes-28.01-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |