Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1574362
| Summary: | Review Request: python-black - Uncompromising Python code formatter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Heimes <cheimes> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, zebob.m |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | zebob.m:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-05-29 10:55:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Christian Heimes
2018-05-03 06:59:49 UTC
- Remove the shebangs of these scripts: python3-black.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/black.py /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/black.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/blib2to3/pgen2/token.py /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/blib2to3/pgen2/token.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Remove_shebang_from_Python_libraries Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 40 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-black/review-python- black/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-black-18.4a4-1.fc29.noarch.rpm python-black-18.4a4-1.fc29.src.rpm python3-black.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter python3-black.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter python3-black.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pycodestyle -> peristyle python3-black.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/black.py /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/black.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/blib2to3/pgen2/token.py /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/blib2to3/pgen2/token.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 python3-black.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary black python3-black.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary black-3.6 python-black.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter python-black.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formatter -> formatted, for matter, for-matter python-black.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pycodestyle -> peristyle 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 8 warnings. Thanks for the package review. I have updated the spec file and SRPM. Since the package hasn't been released yet, I haven't bothered to update the changelog. I hope that's fine with you. Please take a look at the updated spec file. Package approved. (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-black python-black-18.4a4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dd672651f7 python-black-18.4a4-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-db0d9aed55 python-black-18.4a4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dd672651f7 python-black-18.4a4-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-db0d9aed55 python-black-18.5b1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4d9977a1f python-black-18.5b1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7ff0ccb6c6 python-black-18.5b1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4d9977a1f python-black-18.5b1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7ff0ccb6c6 python-black-18.5b1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. python-black-18.5b1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |