Summary: | Translation of "Size" in different contexts ought to be different. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Göran Uddeborg <goeran> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 28 | CC: | digitalfreak, dmach, jrohel, packaging-team-maint, piotrdrag, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-02-21 02:57:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: |
Description
Göran Uddeborg
2018-06-03 21:36:50 UTC
I think it is easy to fix now following the same pattern as in bug 1305340. But I can see more strings which should be split into long and short forms: "Arch" (even in English there could be "Architecture") "Repo" (oh, there is a word "Repository" already in dnf) "From repo" ("From repository"?) "Summary" Anything else? "Name", "Version", "Release", "URL", "Description", "ID"? Maybe split all those which appear in more than one place and potentially may need a long and short version, and eventually leave the decision to the translators whether they want to provide two versions or not? Splitting things is typically a good thing. When the translation is the same it is a little bit of extra work, true. But when the translation for different uses of the same word differ, it could be the difference between a correct and a broken translation. The extra work in the first situation is well worth it. libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29 libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29 dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29 librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fccede810 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29, dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29, libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29, libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29, librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fccede810 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29, dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29, libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29, libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29, librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |