Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1597644

Summary:	Please build python36-Cython
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	John Marshall <jmarshall>
Component:	python3-Cython	Assignee:	Tim Orling <TicoTimo>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel7	CC:	carl, orion, TicoTimo
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python3-Cython-0.28.5-1.el7	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-08-29 21:49:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1597808, 1601115
Bug Blocks:

Description John Marshall 2018-07-03 10:50:06 UTC

Description of problem:

We have both software that requires Python 3.5 or later, and software that needs to be built with Cython. We wish to standardise on one installation of Python 3.x.

Hence we want to use EPEL 7's python36 family of Python 3.6 RPMs, and it would be useful if Cython were packaged as a part of this family; hence we'd appreciate it if EPEL provided a python36-Cython package.

Comment 1 Carl George 2018-07-03 22:21:50 UTC

Looking over this request, this will need python36-coverage, python36-nose, and python36-numpy first.

Comment 2 Carl George 2018-08-09 02:36:07 UTC

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-Cython/pull-request/1

Comment 3 Carl George 2018-09-19 13:23:27 UTC

I saw that the test suite fails on ppc64 only.  Would it be appropriate to skip the test suite only on that arch?

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29679326
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/9356/29679356/build.log

Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2018-09-19 16:06:24 UTC

Depends.  If it's the test that is wrong, sure.  If it's exposing an issue with Cython, it's just going to show up later when other cython dependent builds fail on ppc64.  Needs to be checked out first.

Comment 5 Tim Orling 2018-09-19 16:59:24 UTC

There is an upstream issue for the numpy_subarray [1].

So, that subset of tests is failing with big endian ppc64 (ppc64le succeeds). _IF_ we can just skip the numpy_subarray tests for only ppc64 then at least it would get us past the appearance of FTBFS.

For reference, Debian skips numpy_subarray and numpy_memoryview [2].

[1] https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/1982
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/cython/blob/debian/master/debian/patches/disable_tests.patch

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2019-08-14 22:10:05 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dbc3ee7837 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dbc3ee7837

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-08-15 17:59:37 UTC

python3-Cython-0.28.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-dbc3ee7837

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-08-29 21:49:54 UTC

python3-Cython-0.28.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.