Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1623078
Summary: | libtool is missing gcc and gcc-c++ build requires | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marek Kašík <mkasik> |
Component: | libtool | Assignee: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 29 | CC: | igor.raits, ivazqueznet, jakub, karsten, kasal, praiskup, rhbugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libtool-2.4.6-27.fc29 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-08-28 13:24:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marek Kašík
2018-08-28 12:45:16 UTC
Good point, thanks for the report! (In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #2) > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtool/c/ > d7abc1ef1ac4ba4e6725ad0dde04070c559ca016?branch=master does it mean that whatever uses libtool has to be in c++? IMO this change is entirely wrong because it's packages which should put BR not only for libtool but also for compilers. I'm pretty sure libtool can function without compilers. (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3) > does it mean that whatever uses libtool has to be in c++? It means that the /bin/libtool is capable to build c++ projects. Ideally, that /bin/libtool script wouldn't be used for package builds, but well... > IMO this change is entirely wrong because it's packages which should put BR > not only for libtool but also for compilers. I don't understand this, can you elaborate? > I'm pretty sure libtool can function without compilers. Yup, but diff the /bin/libtool with/without g++ in BR. I'm completely blind, I thought it is Requires. Ignore everything what I said. Hi, could you create an update for this for Fedora 29? We are required to do updates via bodhi since yesterday. Thanks. libtool-2.4.6-27.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8500fd9cad Done, thanks for the ping. libtool-2.4.6-27.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8500fd9cad libtool-2.4.6-27.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8500fd9cad libtool-2.4.6-27.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |