Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 166208

Summary: Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: José Matos <jamatos>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://tinyerp.org
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-29 09:01:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-17 20:59:04 UTC
Spec Name or Url: 
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/tinyerp.spec

SRPM Name or Url:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/tinyerp-2.1.3-5.src.rpm

Description: 

Tiny ERP is a free enterprise management software package. It
covers all domains for small to medium businesses; accounting,
stock management, sales, customer relationship, purchases,
project management...

Comment 1 José Matos 2005-08-18 12:55:03 UTC
Review Request: tinyerp : Open Source ERP Client  
  
I copy parts of a message sent to the extras list before:  
  
  The package seems interesting but I am unable to make it:  
  
+ ./setup.py build  
Xlib: connection to "localhost:0.0" refused by server  
Xlib: No protocol specified  
  
  This is what I get using mock. I am building the packages remotely and I   
would expect for the fedora build system to fail as well in this case.  
  
  The culprit it is clearly the pygtk2 detection code that requires an X   
server to be running to confirm that the package is present. Is there any   
other alternative for this?  
 

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-18 14:22:54 UTC
Hmm. Good point. I worked around this by using Xvfb instead. Take a look at -6:

New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/tinyerp-2.1.3-6.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/tinyerp.spec

Comment 3 José Matos 2005-08-18 19:09:35 UTC
+ It builds cleanly in mock for FC4/i386 
 
+ rpmlint gives: 
E: tinyerp 
incorrect-locale-sv /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tinyerp-client.mo 
 
  (weird) 
 
E: tinyerp-server explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python 
E: tinyerp-server explicit-lib-dependency libxslt-python 
 
  (it is just rpmlint being silly, can be ignored) 
 
E: tinyerp-server 
non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/tinyerp_server/report/render/rml2pdf/trml2pdf.py 
0644 
E: tinyerp-server 
non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/tinyerp_server/addons/stock/stock.py 
0644 
E: tinyerp-server 
non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/tinyerp_server/report/render/rml2html/rml2html.py 
0644 
E: tinyerp-server 
non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/tinyerp_server/netsvc.py 
0644 
 
  (I trust your judgment here.) 
 
+ license is correct (GPL) and is present in both packages 
+ %find_lang use 
+ spec file is written in English and is readable 
+ %{?dist} use 
+ desktop entry 
+ %files is correct and it handles directory ownership correctly 
+ sha1sum of sources is the same as upstream 
+ %subject is OK 
+ %description is OK 
 
After all this consider it APPROVED. 
 

Comment 4 José Matos 2006-08-29 08:55:40 UTC
Reopening bug to fix assignee.

Comment 5 José Matos 2006-08-29 09:01:13 UTC
Assignee fixed, closing again.