Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 167405
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Hook-LexWrap - Lexically scoped subroutine wrappers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Paul Howarth <paul> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Hook-LexWrap-0.20-1.src.rpm | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-09-10 01:28:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 168227 |
Description
Jose Pedro Oliveira
2005-09-02 13:17:13 UTC
APPROVED Package still has redundant BR: perl and does not include text of either GPL or Artistic license. (In reply to comment #2) > Package still has redundant BR: perl and does not include text of either GPL or > Artistic license I read this as a formal veto. Therefore, I am assigning the package to Paul, and push it back to FE-REVIEW. I have no plans of adding license files not include in the source tarball. People installing only the binary RPMS won't be able to know if they were added by the author or by a third party, and I don't want to induce someone in error if I make mistakes (shipping incomplete license info, placing the wrong license, ...). So as of this moment I am also stopping updating/reviewing/approving packages. CVS devel branch: Added a comment about the license files location to the specfile. This package now meets the updated policy. Approved. Thanks. (In reply to comment #6) > This package now meets the updated policy. Approved. Which updated policy? I haven't seen anything on -maintainers or fedora-extras-list, nor have the package review guidelines been updated. What did I miss? Paul, The temporary [1] policy update was only posted to the FESCO mailling list. /jpo [1] - We are still waiting for Legal feedback. |