Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 168800
Summary: | Review Request: haddock | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://haskell.org/haddock/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-09-28 03:30:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Jens Petersen
2005-09-20 12:59:56 UTC
Cannot download http://people.redhat.com/petersen/haddock.spec: Permission denied. Oops, thanks Gemi for looking and sorry about that. Should be better now. :) - rpmlint: W: haddock non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec However this is an omission of rpmlint. - Is it necessary to include the version number in the binary and the data directory names. - BuildRoot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Does %configure not work instead of ./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir} ? Thanks for the comments. I dropped the versioned binary wrapper. The version in the datadir is also due to upstream. I suppose it could go, but debian also has it fwiw. I corrected BuildRoot and made it use %configure. Also dropped the empty debuginfo package, and simplified the description. http://people.redhat.com/petersen/haddock.spec-1.1 %configure doesn't seem to work after all, the automatically generated parameters to configure make it fail, so revert to the previous explicit configure line. N.B. if you create a new src rpm for the new spec, I do not have to do it myself to submit it to mock. Hmm, I was wondering about %configure too, though it worked ok on my fc4 box. Thanks for the careful review. I uploaded: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/haddock-0.7-1.2.src.rpm It's looking good now. APPROVED Thank you. haddock has been imported and built in devel. haddock is needed to build older ghc with docs. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: haddock New Branches: el4 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). |