Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 168905
Summary: | Review Request: python-nltk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.salim> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Aurelien Bompard <gauret> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://hircus.org/fedora/python-nltk/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-12 11:08:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Michel Alexandre Salim
2005-09-21 04:59:27 UTC
This package can't be noarch since it installs files in %{_libdir}, which becomes /usr/lib64 on x86_64 systems. I don't see any other problem :) I only see py/pyc/pyo in this package which are being installed to /usr/lib even on x86_64. $uname -m x86_64 $ python -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()" /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages Since this is the definition of python_sitelib which is used in the spec file, files should either be installed in /usr/lib or it will cause rpmbuild to error out. Ah, right, I thought %{python_sitelib} was based on %{_libdir}, but obviously it is not :) Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source nltk-1.4.4.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of python-nltk looks OK * File list of python-nltk looks OK * Included demo runs fine. APPROVED python-nltk is published, closing bug |